Facilitator: Robert Hill
This is third session in this pre-conference event.  The session leader was both informative and most entertaining. His  witty quotes and comments added a special flavour to his presentation of  the relationship between films and the books on which they are based.  He started by his nice play on words: Horrorgate—which sums up nicely  his choice of horror novels and their various related screen  reproductions. It was most humorous to hear about how Edger Allan Poe’s  The Masque of the Red Death relates to recent H1N5 and H1N1 scares. His  illustration of the most recommended sneezing habits was memorable  comparing the most recent sneezing tradition as The Dracula  Sneeze—chosen as the most creative word of 2009 by the American Dialect  Society. His most comic quote was about how IMDb includes the best and  the worst reviews on the Web. “It was said that if you give a million  words to a million people and they’d produce Shakespeare-like works. But  the Internet has proves us wrong!”
The presenter gave examples from two interesting  websites: www.rottentomatoes.com  and the famous www.imbd.com  website. The session was full of illustrative activities of how to use  posters and books covers to elicit information about the films and/or  books. The presenter particularly focused on Frankenstein and Dracula.
The presenter raised issues, such as the mismatch  between seeing and describing posters and book covers, the emphasis  placed on various visual elements (women, weapons, thunder, etc), the  use of images, taglines, quotes, etc, and the choice of best posters  even if you end up creating one yourself. He also used some recent film  posters (Twilight) to highlight themes of contamination, hybridization,  allusion, and intertextuality. He contrasted this one with the poster of  Underworld where there are clichéd echoes of other films, such as  Matrix, Seven, Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, and Hulk.
The presenter nicely concluded by the idea of  maintaining human-like features—i.e. the noble savage—of a monster in  films. The implication is that these monsters can somehow be identified  with.
No comments:
Post a Comment